With the flurry of recent legal developments, we discovered a source that attempted to pull at least some of it together. E! Online tries to make sense of the latest entanglements.
First, there is a lawsuit initiated by Ayscough & Marar, which claimes Michael owes more than $200,000 in legal fees for services rendered in 2005.
That suit, filed on July 25 in Los Angeles Superior Court and obtained through TMZ.com, alleges that Michael hired Ayscough & Marar during the molestation trial to perform such tasks as obtaining court orders sealing civil cases filed against him from going to the press and orders that would stay discovery in those cases while the criminal trial was proceeding.
One of the cases that the firm worked on pushing back was the Marc Schaffel lawsuit filed against Michael by his former business associated. That resulted in a split decision last month.
Attorney Brent Ayscough claims that by the summer of 2005, “Nearly all of my time was spent on Michael Jackson cases.”
Ayscough claimes that until mid 2005, he was paid. But then, the responsibility for payment shifted from Michael’s business advisor, Ron Burkle, to the law firm of Mesereau & Yu. At that time, he claims that the payments stopped.
The suit reports that Mesereau & Yu were paid a lump sum payment of $2.6 million that was supposed to be divided among the members of Michael’s legal teams. Also according to the suit, Ayscough & Marar never received their due.
Mesereau & Yu is not named as a defendant. The suit does go on to detail numerous other significant debts owed by Michael, including one in excess of $300 million to Fortress Investment Group, over $1.6 million to his brother, Randy, and millions to a variety of other lawyers.
This brings us to the past Monday when a federal judge allowed a breach-of-contract suit brought by the Prescient Acquisition Group to move forward against MJ Publishing Trust.
Prescient is seeking at least $48 million for its part in helping Michael refinance $272.5 million bank loan as well as helping him to acquire a larger part of the Beatles catalogue.
The judge in this suit has ordered all parties, including Michael, to appear in court in September.
And we are not finished yet.
Trial is scheduled to begin on Tuesday in Michael’s lawsuit against concert promoter Marcel Avram.
Michael sued Avram last year, challenging Avram’s attempts to arbitrate a dispute regarding an earlier settlement rather than to have it go forward and be resolved in court.
Initially, Avram sued Michael in 2000 for backing out of a pair of millennium concerts that resulted in a loss of millions for Avram.
In 2003, a jury ruled that Michael owed Avram $5.3 million in damages. That is much less the requested $21 million.
Avram’s suit also requested damages be awarded for a couple of charity concerts that Michael cancelled. That part of the case was settled out of court.
Avram and Michael reached a tentative agreement that would allow Avram to sell CDs and DVDs from concerts that he had promoted earlier. it was agreed under the terms of this deal that any further claims regarding the cancelled concerts would be resolved in Superior Court.
Then, Sony Music, that controls the music, refused to allow Avram to release any new materials. This lead the promoter to pursue arbitration. Michael then turned around and filed another lawsuit, attempting to block Avram from resolving their dispute in any manner other than the one agreed upon.
In the meantime, Michael, relocated in Europe, is not expected to attend this trial.
Source: E! Online, MJFC